I would like to make an important note on posting of images. I have done a series of tests on servers to verify my results, feel free to do so yourself to confirm my findings.
The only real factor of any importance when posting an image is not the size of the image but the size of the file. The bandwidth does not change whether you use image tags or not. Image tags are only a courtesy factor.
The file size increases with the image resolution and it is resolution that eats bandwidth.
When an image is being transferred over a network, the file size is directly related to the elapsed time needed to deliver the image.
I have posted images on this server that where 60K jpeg lowres only to have them removed by the admin. Not because the file was large, I believe it was removed because I forgot to specify image tags to contain the image, which would not have changed the bandwidth nor the load time.
Just because an image looks large does not mean that it is large. image tags can increase/decrease the size of the image but does not imcrease the bandwidth, only the file size and resolution does this.
I see meny high resolution images taking 15 mins or so (56k) from a total post to load. I can't help but save the page to my computer and analyze the images and find out what's going on, then I compare this to image directory it came from on the board and find a very large image with a larger file size, why? Because we are using image tags to reduce the size it looks rather then taking the time to actually reduce the size of the file... tell me this makes any sense?
Deleting posts based apon the size of the image not the size of the file is pointless and is not solving the server space issue nor the bandwidth.
I look forward to comments on this.