>There is a reason they are seconds. And why they don't have a sticker.
They have small cosmetic faults/chips around the margins of the crystals. The effect on output is negligble. 3A tested them and so did we. They have no sticker because they also have/had no warranty.
>Series the 2X80W, series the 55&75W. If you want 24V.
Will keep that in mind.
>That 5% is within many brand's tolerances of 1st quality PVs. Why didn't they put a UL or CE sticker on them?
The 5% 3A was talking about was the amount of wattage diff between panels in a mixed array.
>If the 80W's were good enough to be 80W, why didn't Matrix rate them as 75W, put on the UL/CE sticker, and sell them for more money?
The 80s were good enough for 3A to call them 80s. My tests - while not precise - are close enough for the price paid. Cosmetic flaws cannot be sold for more money. People want the unflawed at retail.
>I see A^3 solar still lists 85W Matrix 2nds, without the 25 year warranty. And how they have a waiting list.
The price is right if it's only cosmetic.
>Funny? Matrix went under a while ago.
I heard they moved the factory to Germany because demand there is so outrageous.
>Maybe because they were selling 75W PVs as 80W, but at a discounted price?
That was 3A's claim.
>I liked the Matrix PVs. Never had a bad one (USA or France).
Never seen a bad one either.
>The indiv. panel diodes will make no difference with 12V or 24V systems. Unless one fails to short, which is very bad.
Or unless your simple low tech 12vdc crib doesn't have diodes downstream.
So why does 3A say you shouldn't mix panels with too much wattage difference?