Hey Flux, and or anyone else
I thought that you was right as I have been looking at this set-up for a few days now, especially the bottom picture running this through my mind and trying to picture how this would work.
Up until a few minutes ago I had come to the same conclusion as you, but I think we had both been looking at it wrong (possibly) and it seemed to operate totally opposite than it should or appears.
Picture this in your mind and let me know if it makes better since as it does to me. Looking at the bottom pic. unfortunately not having more pictures to go by, in my mind I was putting the generator (induction motor or PM conversion, like you said) on the bottom side of this hub (springs facing on coming wind), reverse it and put the springs side facing the generator.
Doing that as I see it makes a bit more since, and IF the generator lost it's load the blades would go into stall (if stall would be the correct term there) then making it a "speed controlled pitch mechanism" assuming the generator could overpower the blades and the load remained constant. There may be more than I am seeing here, not sure.
Does this sound right? or am I in a state of confusion still.
Again it's not my design and I'm not trying to sell this on anyone but if I can be made to understand it better I think I would like to proceed in building one myself and testing it's design on a large PM generator I am slowly building (15" diameter using 40 2x1x.5 neo's, 20 poles, 30 coils 3 phase).
Would this design need to be coupled to some sort of variable load through a complex controller for it to work properly?
The way I see it now, under a high load the blades would pitch flat to the wind when they should be angled, (this is where I am still confused) or would the compression springs take care of that?
Your thoughts or anyone else's?
methanolcat